The trouble with defence
you are always playing catch up
I was reading in Mercola that pharma is trying to have NAC taken of the supplement table. This is not new they do it or versions of it all the time.
In canada one of the tricks used is to limit the dosage size. Example in the USA you can purchase D3 capsules in 10,000 iu’s in canada 1,000. The consequence of this is taking a canadian dosage is ineffective, of no benefit,,,, unless you consume ten caps per event. You may feel ‘so what’ take the ten caps. Seems sensible however the unit content of the bottle is 200-300, in canada you would be through your bottle in 20-30 days. In the USA you go through the bottle in 200-300 days. In canada if you follow the dosage guideline you recieve no benefit and buy 11 times more.
Now pharma is suppressing non patentable/non profitable drugs to the such a degree it is causing death and suffering. These tactics are not new. They are so confident on their stranglhold on legislators they are continuing with the lies and suppression even though they are being exposed.
Luckily we have a wonderful defensive line, we all know their names and appreciate them very much. Time to bolster the offensive line, which is actually the defensive line,,confused?.
Ok so how.
An organization that is funded by 10 dollar donations maxing at 120 per year. Limited donations size no influence the media can use against us.
That organization is tasked with investigating generic drugs. An example: Ivermectin has many uses including but not limited to covid. Evaluate the vitamin and supplement markets, ensuring proper dosages and inclusion or exclusions.
I would gladly support that institution, would you? The doctors research scientists will need equipment, funding , saleries, media outlet. Please circulate this posting if we can get enough interest its simple enough to organize. I am sure we have accountants, lawyers, tax specialists in our ‘informed’ movement.
You know what they say aboutr the best defence
shawn663
I have been advocating for the creation of a citizen fund for medical research. I will copy a comment I made earlier here.
=====
I have a speculation and a proposal for you.
I speculate that the elite are thinking as follows. We are rich, we wield a lot of power, we want for nothing money can buy, we want for very little else that is available on the black markets, we have an irrational infantile desire to live forever, we sill settle for living for as long as possible, we have been sold the idea that this can be achieved with gene based therapies by opportunistic snake oil pedlars, we want to do everything to help them develop their snake oil, they bemoan the fact that humanity is loath to experiment with gene therapies in humans on a large scale, we can help manipulate humanity into normalising gene therapy experiments so life extension therapies can be developed for the elite. The rest is just means to an end.
I would like to propose that you raise the following idea with as many resistance fighters/activists as you can, perhaps you can write here on substack, no need to mention me and you can even claim it is your idea if you are the first to gain traction. There should be at least one totally independent funding site for research. It should have a place where unconflicted (but in some way accredited) researchers can share their credentials, fields of specialisation and research goals. It would have a place where lay folk like me can propose ideas for studies, such as how much does lanolin need to be irradiated to be useful as a topical Vitamin-D3 source with application, or what sort of technical challenges need to be overcome to develop a home based 25(OH)D3 text system. It would need a peer and interested party group that would see id a research proposal is possible to answer public research goals and try and match them up with accredited researchers who could register a research proposal. Then it would also have a crowd financing portal where ANYONE can sponsor money into a common pool, into a topic of their interest, for a researchers they trust, a specific public proposal or a registered trial proposal. At such time as enough funds are collected to cover the needs of a trial the researchers would be contracted to proceed with the trial and they only conflict of interest would be the funders who would be the "Citizens Research Foundation" which could be a not for profit. This would allow for people to get research that is of value to the people and cannot be tainted by pharma money. The researchers would not get paid but their sponsoring institution would have the study costs covered on condition that all raw data is published as soon as the preprint is released after the preprint is published. That release of raw data would be the paid deliverable and all publications free to read. If the study is well done the institution and the researchers would gain credit. Everything would be open source with as few leaders (that can be subverted) as possible driven by best practice and consensus with no outside interference and strict term limits. A alternative structure that could grow fast and reliably to replace the existing mess as it gains in trust and reputation.
Here is my collection of selected reading on the Vitamin-D3 topic.
https://cholecalciferol.miraheze.org/wiki/DOI
PS. The news syndicates Reuters and Associated Press are the means that propaganda is disseminated. The hundreds of global news outlets have lost the skill to do journalism so now simply repeat the narrative obediently. Tracking news that is flashed everywhere simultaneously should automatically be given a propaganda warning. I have suggested someone write a plug-in for the main browsers that would strike-through or redact the names of propaganda experts while we are browsing the net so we know that when something is attributed to them we know that it is not attributed to a factual source but in fact a propaganda narrative. I believe two similar products was developed a long time ago where one would add a Finnish Swear word to a news headline from a certain media outlet and another would simply add a question mark "?" to the end of every mainstream media headline so people can be prepared to be critical when they read something.