The FLCCC was just booted from YouTube. Resistance is hard. Certainly a name and shame site would be useful, perhaps Reiner Fuellmich already has something set up that people could visit, update, share.
A way to reach lots of people might be a browser plug-in that will highlight the names of people who have been involved in probable human rights abuses. So that they get 'mostly redacted' from my reading so I know that what I am reading is the words of a person who does not have the interests of humanity at heart.
It would need to have names of people and organisations collected by crowd sourcing with references/facts that are not trivial to dispute. People who have contradicted themselves are the easiest to verify.
This way a page that is full of grey boxes can be seen to be propaganda and people will not trust the message.
Another plug-in I saw or dreamed about was one that would add a question mark to every mainstream media headline in the browser, it would help people question what we are fed.
Dear Shawn, thank you for engaging, and being receptive to fringe ideas.
I don't know much about current plug ins I saw one called HabroSanitiser for Firefox that may offer inspiration, very niche and not popular at all but perhaps the developer can be hired for coding assistance. If just 1% of the worlds coders are aware of propaganda there must be enough coders to want to do this, it would probably only require 5-10 competent coders to pull such off fast. You have a platform of lots of people, put out a call, start a crowd funding project to pay for overheads. Keep source in multiple repositories or off line in case big tech wants to restrict spread.
The problem is that those lies and un-facts that can be 100% debunked should be made known to everybody. Those people who promote this in the face of good evidence should be put on notice, by naming and shaming and have relevant legal statues indicated they break, I believe those that are knowingly helping with the scam have been told they will be protected from prosecution and side effects, little do they know they will be the first under a bus when no longer needed. The plug-ins could be promoted to and by anyone as propaganda detectors, t-shits with QR-codes linking to the download site could be given away at rallies. Everybody wants a de-propagandizer that is not in the hands of those that generate the propaganda. Let us fight back with the tools we have. Perhaps the brave browser could bundle it or advertise it, people could manually fetch new keywords and names. Make the app honest and respectful, no network traffic without the users explicit request. Tiny icon to indicate a week/month has passed since they last fetched propaganda keywords that they can use to download new ones. No nagging. Offer to purchase T-Shirts and QR-code labels at cost+100% with the other half being used to make material for rallies and any club, school, workplace that has a brain.
Flat earth could be debunked, chem trails listed as rubbish but harder to definitively disprove, Vitamin-D3 natural serum levels could be shown to be over 40ng/ml=100nmol/l and the benefits of 50ng/ml=125nmol/l demonstrated. (lots of facts available, see my home URL on FB).
The use of Ivermectin by the WHO in India to put an end to the pandemic there but still no mention on the WHO site in spite of the fact that they promised to write up the program results (check cumulative covid death totals of UK, World, India, Japan on Our World In Data to see when the rapid rise was stopped).
Every news organisation that blindly repeats Reuters and AP should be flagged as distributing propaganda.
If you contact (via Signal) the other 20 big names in covid sanity and figure who could coordinate perhaps sponsor a bit you could have something working in a week and data entered from multiple sources.
Every regulator that is funded by those they regulate should be flagged as captured. So a central repository for the evil in the world that makes it easy for the man in the street to see where the lies are and HOW MUCH of it there is.
Be better than the 'fact checkers' by actually checking against facts and not the narrative. I think all fact checkers will get flagged for propaganda and conflict of interest.
There used to be a browser plug-in that would inject Finnish swearwords into news headlines (I'm pretty sure) that gives me hope that it could be done. I think some search term plug-ins can highlight the text on a page, this technology is probably already out there. The data could be compressed and kept local so very little traffic to monitor.
As a security measure the servers should serve the data without requiring a https request. I have a deep seated misgiving about the big tech use of certificates. and the fact that browser pages are almost forced to use them in newer browsers. The inception of LetsEncryp was like looking at a well meaning group captured by a security service trojan development team and a lot of the internet is vulnerable to security certificate revocation and I believe that a lot of statistical information is collected that is not disclosed to us on the use of certificates.
In my humble opinion Substack should proceed to remove the use of cookies and any offsite fetches (especially google) for fonts, images, seo, tracking so that it can tell visitor that they are not one of the bad guys. I don't have a clue and shudder to think who owns Substack and should one of the last free media sources not be in the hands of the people 100%.
I do hope you will try to take this further. I could offer ideas but not a coder or a public figure, see me on facebook if you want to see my views.
The FLCCC was just booted from YouTube. Resistance is hard. Certainly a name and shame site would be useful, perhaps Reiner Fuellmich already has something set up that people could visit, update, share.
Hi Kalle That is a good place for a name and shame, do you have access to his network?
Regrettably, no connections. I am a little fish.
A way to reach lots of people might be a browser plug-in that will highlight the names of people who have been involved in probable human rights abuses. So that they get 'mostly redacted' from my reading so I know that what I am reading is the words of a person who does not have the interests of humanity at heart.
It would need to have names of people and organisations collected by crowd sourcing with references/facts that are not trivial to dispute. People who have contradicted themselves are the easiest to verify.
This way a page that is full of grey boxes can be seen to be propaganda and people will not trust the message.
Another plug-in I saw or dreamed about was one that would add a question mark to every mainstream media headline in the browser, it would help people question what we are fed.
that is an excellent idea, these plug ins exist?
Dear Shawn, thank you for engaging, and being receptive to fringe ideas.
I don't know much about current plug ins I saw one called HabroSanitiser for Firefox that may offer inspiration, very niche and not popular at all but perhaps the developer can be hired for coding assistance. If just 1% of the worlds coders are aware of propaganda there must be enough coders to want to do this, it would probably only require 5-10 competent coders to pull such off fast. You have a platform of lots of people, put out a call, start a crowd funding project to pay for overheads. Keep source in multiple repositories or off line in case big tech wants to restrict spread.
The problem is that those lies and un-facts that can be 100% debunked should be made known to everybody. Those people who promote this in the face of good evidence should be put on notice, by naming and shaming and have relevant legal statues indicated they break, I believe those that are knowingly helping with the scam have been told they will be protected from prosecution and side effects, little do they know they will be the first under a bus when no longer needed. The plug-ins could be promoted to and by anyone as propaganda detectors, t-shits with QR-codes linking to the download site could be given away at rallies. Everybody wants a de-propagandizer that is not in the hands of those that generate the propaganda. Let us fight back with the tools we have. Perhaps the brave browser could bundle it or advertise it, people could manually fetch new keywords and names. Make the app honest and respectful, no network traffic without the users explicit request. Tiny icon to indicate a week/month has passed since they last fetched propaganda keywords that they can use to download new ones. No nagging. Offer to purchase T-Shirts and QR-code labels at cost+100% with the other half being used to make material for rallies and any club, school, workplace that has a brain.
Flat earth could be debunked, chem trails listed as rubbish but harder to definitively disprove, Vitamin-D3 natural serum levels could be shown to be over 40ng/ml=100nmol/l and the benefits of 50ng/ml=125nmol/l demonstrated. (lots of facts available, see my home URL on FB).
The use of Ivermectin by the WHO in India to put an end to the pandemic there but still no mention on the WHO site in spite of the fact that they promised to write up the program results (check cumulative covid death totals of UK, World, India, Japan on Our World In Data to see when the rapid rise was stopped).
Every news organisation that blindly repeats Reuters and AP should be flagged as distributing propaganda.
If you contact (via Signal) the other 20 big names in covid sanity and figure who could coordinate perhaps sponsor a bit you could have something working in a week and data entered from multiple sources.
Every regulator that is funded by those they regulate should be flagged as captured. So a central repository for the evil in the world that makes it easy for the man in the street to see where the lies are and HOW MUCH of it there is.
Be better than the 'fact checkers' by actually checking against facts and not the narrative. I think all fact checkers will get flagged for propaganda and conflict of interest.
There used to be a browser plug-in that would inject Finnish swearwords into news headlines (I'm pretty sure) that gives me hope that it could be done. I think some search term plug-ins can highlight the text on a page, this technology is probably already out there. The data could be compressed and kept local so very little traffic to monitor.
As a security measure the servers should serve the data without requiring a https request. I have a deep seated misgiving about the big tech use of certificates. and the fact that browser pages are almost forced to use them in newer browsers. The inception of LetsEncryp was like looking at a well meaning group captured by a security service trojan development team and a lot of the internet is vulnerable to security certificate revocation and I believe that a lot of statistical information is collected that is not disclosed to us on the use of certificates.
In my humble opinion Substack should proceed to remove the use of cookies and any offsite fetches (especially google) for fonts, images, seo, tracking so that it can tell visitor that they are not one of the bad guys. I don't have a clue and shudder to think who owns Substack and should one of the last free media sources not be in the hands of the people 100%.
I do hope you will try to take this further. I could offer ideas but not a coder or a public figure, see me on facebook if you want to see my views.
Name and Shame--I like that. Enough with faceless big entities that we feel “powerless” to do anything about. Hold PEOPLE accountable.
100% agreement, its critical that a price be paid or it will never stop. Just keep throwing it at the wall until something sticks.