Everybody's talkin bout Tulsi
from No weapons in development to WMD's imminent, what happened.
We know:
*1-No candidate can win the presidency without the support of AIPAC.
*2-DNC will not support a candidate not supported by AIPAC
*critically important
1-Tulsi as the next DNC pick for president, ok probably. 2-She is perfect: A women A veteran Attractive Experienced in high political office Public speaking skills similar to Obama
So why the switch why would she do a screeching reversal on bombing Iran:
the lure of the top spot.
However;
She could have been the Black Swan candidate possibly winning without the DNC AIPAC support, imagine .
Had she resigned in protest over Trump’s action/comments(“I don’t care what she says”) Tulsi would have proven to the world her character. Had she stood up for right and truth she could have come into the election cycle with proof of her honor, dignity and trust, ethics and truth. These are the things voters are craving right now, these are the qualities the voters want in a candidate.
Will she still get the DNC nod, yes of course.
Yes there will be a problem with her abrupt turn on WMD but a small problem that can be easily spun. The republican voter will forgive because of her military service and loyalty to the flag and standard jingoism. The democratic voter will embrace her regardless because she can defeat Vance . Additionally as proven by covid the people will do what they are told by the television news actors.
She coulda been one of the greats.
IVERMECTIN/Hydroxy work Who knew, When did they know, Who suppressed it
Accountability Now Now Now
Shawn663