Daily Covid Briefing Death Toll During Pandemic Far Exceeds Totals Reported by Countries, W.H.O. Says
NYTimes headline I am not sure if I am obligated to pay them for it.
As the date says written in Feb. Time is our enemy and their best friend, act now. One of the points of this headline article is to deflate Ivermectin /Hydroxy. They know the numbers point to I/H usage leads to lower death rates. To counter this particular truth produce hiugh death counts. Their numbers were in fact higher therefore the I/H drugs didnt work
They are setting the agenda.
Misinformation, on which side
Feb 28
The media is definitely retrenching the misinformation tag line. Undoubtedly contingency plans are being drawn to handle all scenarios. Within the misinformation programs, who will be sacrificed who will be protected. Will we let them set the agenda of their own defence.
What happens when the truth does come out. Is anyone keeping track of what is being said and by whom. Will those people that spread the real misinformation be accountable. Will the media and corporate interests re-tangle the story so as to make themselves immune to the consequences of their words. The consequence of those words possibly causing millions of deaths. From faux science to faux fact checkers to corrupt politicians to corporate disinformation.
What will we do?
I would like to start a online discussion:
In Canada and USA we need forensic investigation starting at Mulrony(Canada) Reagan(USA) remember this is not political its an investigation of facts.
We are looking for legislation which looked innocent at the time or at least acceptable. The small steps in governing that led to todays result.
Deregulation of media companies, single investment companies owning multiple positions in media, pharma, banking, technology etc…
keep in mind 10 years ago no one- left or right- would have agreed to allow media censorship as it is today. These end points did not happen by chance nor did the happen in one sweeping legislation.
Shawn663
I vote that ANY legal failure that can be conclusively proven even if it results in almost no damages should be undertaken to make precedent. There are smart people who know the science, there are some in the resistance with a bit of money and crowd funding can still be used if done carefully and there must be a few lawyers/advocates, prosecutors and judges who can be trusted to follow the law.
Use the methods that are the fastest to prosecute or the surest fire wins. If you go after the little fish and word gets out that they do not have the protection they were promised we should see some defections and they will be the best sources of information.
I am sad at how those in power (lawyers, doctors, elected officials, public health officials) have consistently let society down even though they gain no personal benefit and will be thrown under the bus as soon as it suits the powerful. We just need to show them how they have no protection so they can stop with the lies.