Is it a crime to suppress one treatment protocol in favour of another treatment protocol.
Consider the suppressed treatment is available immediately the other treatment is months away. The death rate per day according to the agencies is 10,000 per day?(not sure) Each day delay costs 10,000 lives.
I think most people will agree allowing people to die or suffer when a treatment is available is a crime.
It is argued (IVERMECTIN) was not studied for COVID and therefore more trials are required. Keep in mind IVERMECTIN has been prescribed / been available OTC(over the counter) for approximately 40 years. Prescriptions to date 3.7billion times/
16 deaths/4,000 adverse events.
Remember the Vaccine product didn’t exist prior to COVID we know that because it took a a years worth of deaths while satisfying the need for development/clinical trial, there is an advantage to letting the deaths mount of course, as I am sure you know. Comparing the 2 options I would say use everything thing you have available. IVERMECTIN.
In Canada we have a health department which guides the country and advises the Government. Were they incompetent causing 35,000 deaths or the other unthinkable.
What do we do now.
Will it fade away without being exposed to the light. The 2008 financial meltdown did in fact it paid bonus payments to CEO’s.
Shawn663